AT 11:00 AM . . . ANNE & I STOOD IN SILENCE WEARING OUR POPPIES:
It’s ONLY A Gesture . . . But Its Meaning Is Everything.
I will Write MORE about Today . . . than I will Write about Yesterday, since I've already Stated my Case . . . that to these Men & Women who have Sacrificed so Much in Uniform, to Fight for our Freedoms, so we don’t have to – that no matter what we Write, Say or Do, WE CAN NEVER SUFFICIENTLY SAY THANK YOU.
BUT WHAT WE CAN DO . . . AND MUST DO – Is To Make Certain Their Effort & Sacrifice Wasn’t Made In Vain . . .
THEREFORE . . . IN HONOR TO OUR VETS – I DEDICATE THIS EDITORIAL:
I DON'T LIKE ANYTHING MUCH ABOUT JOHN MCCAIN . . . He was NEVER a Maverick, as he likes people to think of him. But in all reality, I see McCain as nothing more and nothing less than a Showboat, who was always, and will always be about John McCain.
But For John McCain To State For The Record . . .
“The allegations against Roy Moore are deeply disturbing and disqualifying. He should immediately step aside and allow the people of Alabama to elect a candidate they can be proud of.”
EVEN FOR MCCAIN . . . THIS GOES BEYOND RIDICULOUS VENTURING INTO THE BIZARRE:
I have heard and read no shortage of Allegations about McCain, that much of McCain's Vietnam Imprisonment at the Hanoi Hilton wasn’t nearly what it was reported to have been. And when it came to cooperating with the enemy (North Vietnamese), McCain was Right Out-There Singing like a Canary.
ARE ANY OF THESE ALLEGATIONS TRUE ABOUT MCCAIN? If you want to go by McCain’s “Impeccable Media Standards” . . . THEY MUST HAVE BEEN, since it was reported in the News. And we all know – “The News Media Never Lies”.
BUT LETS GET RIGHT TO THE CRUX OF THESES ANTI-MOORE ALLEGATIONS:
Outside of the “CLAIM” that Judge Moore “Flirted” with a 14-Year Old Girl, and Suggested . . . according to the accusation by the now Adult Girl, that Moore Attempted to Engage in Inappropriate “Touching” . . . And by the Admission of the Same Now Adult Girl after more than 34-Years Have Passed – that she States On The Record . . . THERE WAS NO SEXUAL CONTACT WHATSOEVER, I’m having a Problem SEEING THE PROBLEM.
WHERE’S THE CRIME?
Why are we so COMPELLED to believe a Story in the Media that Happened MORE Than 34-Years Ago, especially since there was no SEXUAL CONTACT WHATSOEVER . . . BY THE ADMISSION OF THE NON-VIOLATED NON-VICTIM?
AND WHO’S TO SAY . . . The NON-VICTIM is even telling the Truth, because, if she was so Traumatized by this Outrageous Claim, why did she wait MORE THAN 34-YEARS TO COME FORWARD?
It’s Not As If Judge Moore NEVER Ran For Office or NEVER held an EXTREMELY PUBLIC PROFILE, since it seems to me that Moore has been in Public Life, for Virtually his Entire Life . . . SO WHY NOW?
THEN THERE ‘S THE OTHER ALLEGATION THAT MOORE DATED YOUNGER WOMEN:
SO LET’S END THE BS HERE AND NOW . . . Where’s the Crime in Men Dating YOUNGER WOMEN . . . or as much to the point, in Women Dating YOUNGER MEN?
Judge Moore’s Wife is 14-Years Younger Than Judge Moore . . . so, because the MOORE’S have been Married for more than 32-Years – How Does That Make Judge Moore GUILTY OF ANYTHING?
IN FACT . . . Of the THREE other women who are claiming that Judge Moore DATED them when he was substantially Older than they were, EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE ALL ABOVE THE AGE OF CONSENT, and he NEVER had Sexual Relations with any of them or FORCED himself on any of them . . . I ask again – WHERE’S THE CRIME?
And Even If Judge Moore Had Slept With All Of Them . . . Where’s The Crime?
If Wanting To Date Younger Women Is A Crime . . . Most Men Are Criminals.
IT GOES BEYOND BELIEF . . . THAT THIS IS HOW LOW AMERICAN POLITICS HAS FALLEN:
AS MUCH AS I THOUGHT ABOUT THIS . . . It Bothered Me Enormously – that something Really Serious has been Missing from this OUTRAGEOUS SMEAR JOB, which was simply – Where Is/Was The Crime In Any Of It. And why now has this NOTHING STORY become such an issue?
FOLK WHO WEREN'T GOING TO VOTE FOR MOORE – SHOULD VOTE FOR HIM NOW!
As A Special Shout-Out For His Support – Thank You Joe Magdall.
Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov